<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Less Fidelity in Simulation May Improve Student Learning	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/</link>
	<description>Teach How Nurses Actually Practice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 05:23:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Keith Rischer		</title>
		<link>https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-27058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Rischer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.keithrn.com/?p=99777#comment-27058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-25941&quot;&gt;boberg123&lt;/a&gt;.

It is hard to determine if the decrease in performance is due to stress or cognitive overload. I tend to think that anxiety is a larger factor. To decrease stress, practice does make perfect. Students also need to be reminded that nursing is stressful and how important it is to function at a safe level with stress. This takes time and clinical experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-25941">boberg123</a>.</p>
<p>It is hard to determine if the decrease in performance is due to stress or cognitive overload. I tend to think that anxiety is a larger factor. To decrease stress, practice does make perfect. Students also need to be reminded that nursing is stressful and how important it is to function at a safe level with stress. This takes time and clinical experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: boberg123		</title>
		<link>https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-25941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boberg123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 13:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.keithrn.com/?p=99777#comment-25941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Keith you make some very good points about high vs low fidelity simulations.  One constant comment I get from students in high fidelity simulation is how nervous it makes them knowing they are being filmed and watched.  I always give students a pre sim assignment to prepare them for the upcoming simulation.  There is never anything in the simulation that has not already been covered in didactic yet students continue to tell me of their nervousness and some that it prevents them from doing as well as they believe they could do.  Your post makes me wonder if it is &quot;cognitive overload&quot; and if there is a way I can have the students demonstrate the ability to apply the concepts and lessons they have been studying in didactic (that is the objective/goal, have the students show me they can apply the information to a client situation).  I will be examining my simulations for any extraneous load that can be removed.
In preparation for a simulation, I already give a sim prep assignment, ensure the needed concepts and instruction has been taught in didactic, and I do not assign a grade for simulations.
I would be interested to hear what other educators do to decrease student anxiety related to performance in simulations?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith you make some very good points about high vs low fidelity simulations.  One constant comment I get from students in high fidelity simulation is how nervous it makes them knowing they are being filmed and watched.  I always give students a pre sim assignment to prepare them for the upcoming simulation.  There is never anything in the simulation that has not already been covered in didactic yet students continue to tell me of their nervousness and some that it prevents them from doing as well as they believe they could do.  Your post makes me wonder if it is &#8220;cognitive overload&#8221; and if there is a way I can have the students demonstrate the ability to apply the concepts and lessons they have been studying in didactic (that is the objective/goal, have the students show me they can apply the information to a client situation).  I will be examining my simulations for any extraneous load that can be removed.<br />
In preparation for a simulation, I already give a sim prep assignment, ensure the needed concepts and instruction has been taught in didactic, and I do not assign a grade for simulations.<br />
I would be interested to hear what other educators do to decrease student anxiety related to performance in simulations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tippy Short		</title>
		<link>https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-24100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tippy Short]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.keithrn.com/?p=99777#comment-24100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You make an interesting point about sensory overload.  Recently I ran a simulation with 19 of our intermediate clinical students, working in groups of 4.  Our high fidelity simulator was not working properly so I became the &quot;patient&quot; with another instructor giving students abnormal vital signs, etc. as they worked.  The unanimous feedback from the students was that they &quot;preferred&quot; a real patient and that it made the simulation much more like a real clinical experience.  Interesting!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make an interesting point about sensory overload.  Recently I ran a simulation with 19 of our intermediate clinical students, working in groups of 4.  Our high fidelity simulator was not working properly so I became the &#8220;patient&#8221; with another instructor giving students abnormal vital signs, etc. as they worked.  The unanimous feedback from the students was that they &#8220;preferred&#8221; a real patient and that it made the simulation much more like a real clinical experience.  Interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Keith Rischer		</title>
		<link>https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-23987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Rischer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.keithrn.com/?p=99777#comment-23987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-23986&quot;&gt;Cecelia Hall&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for your feedback Cecelia and just to be clear I am not saying &quot;less is more&quot; it is the conclusion of the researchers who conducted the studies who are making this point. When cognitive load theory is understood in the science of learning this is one hypothesis for this conclusion. I agree that educators need to be careful and make sure that if high fidelity simulation is implemented there is strong evidence to support this change. 
In my literature review I came across a recent article titled &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011333&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Effect of simulation training on the development of nurses and nursing students&#039; critical thinking: A systematic literature review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; (2017) that found that of 16 research articles the findings were inconclusive and eight studies or half found no improvement in developing critical thinking using high fidelity simulation. More research needs to be done on this important topic as learning benefits have also been demonstrated using HFS. 
Remember that no one is born a nurse and a nurse educator and takes time to develop the skills and confidence to teach. My passion is to point educators to educational best practice so that needed transformational change can be implemented that is often as simple as changing the way you teach!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-23986">Cecelia Hall</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for your feedback Cecelia and just to be clear I am not saying &#8220;less is more&#8221; it is the conclusion of the researchers who conducted the studies who are making this point. When cognitive load theory is understood in the science of learning this is one hypothesis for this conclusion. I agree that educators need to be careful and make sure that if high fidelity simulation is implemented there is strong evidence to support this change.<br />
In my literature review I came across a recent article titled <strong><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011333" rel="nofollow">Effect of simulation training on the development of nurses and nursing students&#8217; critical thinking: A systematic literature review</a></strong><em> (2017) that found that of 16 research articles the findings were inconclusive and eight studies or half found no improvement in developing critical thinking using high fidelity simulation. More research needs to be done on this important topic as learning benefits have also been demonstrated using HFS.<br />
Remember that no one is born a nurse and a nurse educator and takes time to develop the skills and confidence to teach. My passion is to point educators to educational best practice so that needed transformational change can be implemented that is often as simple as changing the way you teach!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cecelia Hall		</title>
		<link>https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning/#comment-23986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cecelia Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.keithrn.com/?p=99777#comment-23986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, are you saying “less is more”?  I think you are hitting the nail on the head.  Some of us educators just jump at the latest craze versus some of the gold standards of yesteryear.  If something isn’t broken then don’t fix it.  
On the other hand, some nurse educators are not strong clinically and this is a travesty as well.   So we resort to sim lab?  
As faculty I am in sensory overload with all the technology and poor clinical reasoning and critical thinking. ☹️ Someone needs to be evaluating WHERE AND WHAT TYPE of clinicals students are being provided.  Some faculty are not strong clinically but better in nursing fundamentals, nursing theory, etc.  As a consequence, (my opinion) someone somewhere espouses that simulation is the “best thing since sliced bread”.    Students are graduating from BSN to PhD, with no parameters or targets goals on clinical experiences.  And nurse leaders/educators (gatekeepers) are embracing this new methodology.  The deficits are growing in nursing practice.  Current RNs, NPs (ages 35- 50) are complaining about how underprepared today’s RNs and NPs are.  I am hoping we can return to some of the meaningful ways of putting together well prepared RNs.  ____  CVH]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are you saying “less is more”?  I think you are hitting the nail on the head.  Some of us educators just jump at the latest craze versus some of the gold standards of yesteryear.  If something isn’t broken then don’t fix it.<br />
On the other hand, some nurse educators are not strong clinically and this is a travesty as well.   So we resort to sim lab?<br />
As faculty I am in sensory overload with all the technology and poor clinical reasoning and critical thinking. ☹️ Someone needs to be evaluating WHERE AND WHAT TYPE of clinicals students are being provided.  Some faculty are not strong clinically but better in nursing fundamentals, nursing theory, etc.  As a consequence, (my opinion) someone somewhere espouses that simulation is the “best thing since sliced bread”.    Students are graduating from BSN to PhD, with no parameters or targets goals on clinical experiences.  And nurse leaders/educators (gatekeepers) are embracing this new methodology.  The deficits are growing in nursing practice.  Current RNs, NPs (ages 35- 50) are complaining about how underprepared today’s RNs and NPs are.  I am hoping we can return to some of the meaningful ways of putting together well prepared RNs.  ____  CVH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
